Baby killing troops resent being labeled “babykillers”

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
23
Tokens
02 Apr 2003 20:10:33 GMT

US Troops resent derogatory labels

By Peter Kincaid

Basara, Iraq, April 2 (Reuters) - PFC Desmond Morgan is with the 101st Airborne Division’s 3rd Brigade surrounding Basra in southern Iraq and has the unenviable task of manning a checkpoint that is frequently used by Iraqi civilians. A sea of humanity swarms around this station and it is a sea that is fraught with extreme danger for the young soldier.

“We have no way of knowing who’s with us and who’s against us, they all dress like civilians” says Morgan, wiping sweat off his brow in the sweltering desert heat. “Sometimes we have to just shoot into the crowd and hope for the best.”

As if to demonstrate, Morgan suddenly raises his weapon and fires several rounds over the heads of the terrified civilians, who throw themselves violently into the hot sand.

“Good thing I didn’t ‘miss’” he says, with more than a hint of sarcasm in his voice

Morgan represents a chillingly common attitude amongst US troops in light of devastating and demoralizing suicide and guerrilla attacks on his unit in recent days. 17 American soldiers have been wounded or killed by Iraqi soldiers using various unconventional tactics against the occupying coalition forces.

Earlier, Morgan was witnessed firing his weapon randomly into a crowd of horrified Iraqi civilians causing several injuries and deaths.

“Saddam made me do it” said an unrepentant Morgan, who took under 10 seconds to place a fresh clip in his weapon and take aim and fire at an elderly Iraqi woman. “She could be Uday for all I know”, referring to one of Saddam Hussein’s sons, known to be a master of disguise.

When informed that several of his victims were, in fact, young children who posed no threat whatsoever to the heavily armed coalition forces, Morgan grinned sheepishly and pushed his kevlar helmet back. “Heck, don’t go calling me a ‘babykiller’ now,…either you’re with us or you’re against us!”

In fact, the chillingly accurate epithets of “murderer” and “babykiller” upset the troops surrounding this ancient city. The troops feel that attaching these provocative terms to their necessary duties merely clouds an otherwise clear situation

“Saddam wouldn’t leave, therefore we got some killin’ to do” said one marine. “Heck, if we weren’t liberatin’ them, they’d be developin’ weapons of mass destruction and shit”

"When in doubt, do it!" Fatty Arbuckle
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
232
Tokens
Well, if you are gonna call them baby killers, civilian killers, murders, and all the other labels...well, i guess you might as well do it...damn if you do and damn if you don't....i truly doubt this even occurred, and if it did, i can assure you that reporter won't be getting much protection if shit hits the fan....plus, if this soldier didn't kill babies, women, donkeys, goats, camels, etc...what would Grant post pictures of?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,497
Tokens
gargoyle, if the soldiers didn't protect the reporter no matter what vile things he says, wouldn't that be a dereliction of duty?

Aren't they supposed to be defending the free American way of life, which includes freedom of the press?
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,299
Tokens
“Heck, don’t go calling me a ‘babykiller’ now,…either you’re with us or you’re against us!”

Have a cracker, Polly!
tn_002_jpg.jpg
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
127
Tokens
If this is true, the solider should face court marital. I'm sending this clip to my senators and congressmen. I support this war, but this type of conduct is immoral and illegal under the Geneva Convention and UCMJ
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
127
Tokens
Alpha, please provide a link for this article or let me know where you found it. I've done a search at Reuters and Yahoo and I can not find anything. If this is true, I want to find solid evidence to send to my representives.

Thanks,
KW
 

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Tokens
Killer Watermelon,

Since when do you need solid evidence to send to a liberal senator or congressman?
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,299
Tokens
Since when do you need solid evidence to send to a liberal senator or congressman?

Just like Bush had "solid evidence" to link Bin Laden to Iraq?

icon_rolleyes.gif

Why do the righties do this?
ex. "a liberal congressman is like tits on a bull, utterly useless."

Do those on the right honestly think that saying something disparaging about a liberal is making an ACTUAL commentary about the left's argument.
It comes off as not only being annoying and untrue but unsatisfying as well.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,773
Tokens
Alpha,

you forgot to include the rape of women and children.

Nothing like troops butt****ing little boys to pass the time.

make those changes and send it to the printer. you can have the flyers printed and dropped over NYC by the evening news.

oh saddam said to tell you to keep up the good work.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,299
Tokens
here's a classic example:
oh saddam said to tell you to keep up the good work.

Seriously, what does this do for your credibility??
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,773
Tokens
I thought the "troops butt****ing little boys" part ruined my credibility.

icon_smile.gif


I'm not too worried about how credible I appear on a gambling posting forum.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
127
Tokens
Since when do you need solid evidence to send to a liberal senator or congressman?

Both of my Senators and my congressman are Republicans (I voted for all of them). One Senator a well known and respected Conservative. The other is new to the job, and isn't in the limelight much.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
421
Tokens
02 Apr 2003 23:17:25 GMT


Reported by Ted Koppel on ABC News.


"Alpha Male is a complete loser for having to 'create' his own stories under someone elses name" Said Koppel.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,208
Messages
13,565,382
Members
100,761
Latest member
jhavock123
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com